Many-to-many Community News (Final as submitted)
* Project Title:
Pilot Project: Many-to-Many Community News (initially for Natick, a town of 32,000 at the center of population for Massachusetts)
* Total estimated cost of project (U.S. Dollars):
$200,000
* Time needed to complete proposal:
2 year(s)
* What makes this idea unique?
Democracy needs many-to-many communication. Without it, our self-government lacks something critical: us. This project proposes an online community in which people can 1) see peers' content recommendations and make their own and 2) ask the community, represented by a random jury, to send important news to everyone.
Full openness, transparency, and easy (even effortless) participation will help make our project a locus of news, discussion, and action. Our moral and practical claim to be a common meeting ground rests on the democracy of our methods.
And it will actually happen because we're going to get out there and hustle. Starting in Natick, we will help groups and active citizens, one by one, add our tools to their outreach efforts. They'll join a platform on which prominence comes from community-chosen importance.
We will show, first, a democratic media can be popular. People choose their own sources (in a network which, uniquely, opens the editorial role to all). Our Greg Coppola has a beta at omni-news.net.
Second, a mass media can be democratic. Voting on news to be disseminated to the whole community shows how we can all have a claim to everyone's attention. It also ensures a baseline of common experience.
Our project encourages participation, but requires only minimal participation to succeed. A handful of people stepping up to editorial roles alongside traditional sources provides wider choices of news and views. If everybody writes and recommends, it's even better. Likewise, a dozen people at a time handle requests for distribution to hundreds or hundreds of thousands. With a new jury handling each request the work is shared in tiny pieces by the entire community.
New from diverse sources will be side by side and will help people form affinity groups as they choose sources. Everyone receives news voted important (rampaging elephant) even if not subscribed to the source (lost pet news). All this news and info will be in a framework that encourages comment, discussion, telling others, and proposing real actions.
* Who else would want to use it, and why?
These partners want to use it already: pwgd.org/cnp
Many-to-many Community News is intended for everyone. It will reach beyond our base of people active in their communities for several reasons:
- Openness (kids to businesses– all)
- Transparency of process (trust)
- Distribution decisions made democratically (fairness)
- We will help those writing and gathering information (town government, local media, groups, bloggers) to integrate our tools into their own, so they can broaden their reach with no extra effort
- Original content and democratic moderation easily remixed online and offline
We will be free web and e-mail publishing for anyone, especially anyone who cares about any local issue and wants to be instantly plugged into a larger network.
Why are you the best person or organization to develop this project?
If quality local journalism is to thrive in the 21st century, it will have to be in a mutually beneficial relationship with myriad ways to share information locally. While even competitors like Google and Amazon can have symbiotic relationships, a nonprofit organization dedicated to democracy is best suited to be the keystone in a flourishing ecology of news and information.
If we accept advertising or add local trade, revenue would be shared with content providers. More important, our project gives a second life to news stories as a basis for community self-organization.
A centralized place for community information is far from a new concept, but the philosophy is – an open, nonprofit philosophy, combined with sophisticated technology for enabling everyone contribute information and choose the scope of distribution.
Natick pilot project team members already include Omni-news.net, SpaceShare.com (ridesharing), MyNatick.org, COA News, and the Amazing Things Arts Center. More: pwgd.org/cnp
Software developed will be open source - part of an evolving world-class CMS, Drupal. The two core democratic processes, peer subscriptions and voting on distribution, will be separate modules, which could especially be used by large membership groups. A module to prevent overlapping subscriptions from duplicating content will be a third major contribution.
We will adopt and help others adopt common formats for sharing news and information. Open standards will let future projects share news in ways that we can only imagine now.
Excellent technical volunteers are already working. We are going to do this, and more. How quickly is up to you. We ask Knight to select any piece of the software and fund that, if the entire project including outreach cannot be funded.
Our team members have built online and physical communities independently. Together we will build an open, vibrant online community that connects people to each other, shared goals, and courses of collective action in geographic communities.
[Links and emphasis were not captured by NewsChallenge web form.]
Rejected
After word that the Related Items proposal was moving forward, I finally asked today about the big proposal. Ignorance is bliss:
Many-to-Many community news did not make it to the next round. The main reason was that the proposal needed more focus on specifically what you wanted to do with the grant money. There is a paragraph that talks about the new modules you would create, and if that were more of the focus of the application, it might have fared better -- but I don't want to second-guess the reviewers. I can say that now is a good time to be thinking about what to apply for in the 2007 News Challenge.
If we go through the soul-crushing experience of applying for grants again, any and all separable purposes have to be broken into component parts. What more can be said, in a few hundred words, than we will create this technology, build a real community with it, and promote the living hell out of it?
And, someone else will have to take the lead. At this point I don't expect the radical vision for PWGD to be funded by anyone with money.
~~~
benjamin melançon
a founding member of PWGD
http://melanconent.com/contact/
We're going for it again. Deadline October.
So fifteen thousand dollars to code and blog (minus $900 eaten by the fiscal sponsor, but who's counting) is a heck of a consolation prize, and getting a Google grant also for community-managed taxonomy is more than enough to un-jade a person, such as myself, who knows that getting one out of twenty grants accepted is great, let alone two out of three. (OK, un-jade is not a word, but maybe it should be.)
Sent in response to encouragement from Carla Eliana Curtis née Godoy:
The fairly simple application for the Knight News Challenge grants is here:
The PWGD application still has to be rewritten from the ground up.
Last year's proposal was worked out online [above].
With critiques / revisions by board member Diane Rotz (made after it wasn't chosen), last year's proposal is attached as a rich text format document.
The purpose vision is really clear for me, and the technical vision is pretty clear for me, but they get fuzzy when I try to explain them together. Maybe the tech part can be dropped?
Broad purpose: To help all people each have the most possible control over their own lives.
More specific: Mass communication and interaction that is not controlled by any party.
A fact:
* Mass communication requires some kind of moderation, filtering.
A proposition:
* For the best pursuit of truth and societal betterment, we need access to mass communication not controlled by any corporation, government, organization, or person.
Suggestion:
* A new kind of democratic filtering based on a random selection of people in the network every time a broadcast decision has to be made.
Everything can go on a web site, but what will be featured, what will be sent as an e-mail alert or as other means of communication? A new jury drawn from people in the network will decide if a message goes out to the broader group (people who did not specifically request messages on this topic or source).
Thanks!
This establishes a much-needed common knowledge or understanding (see for instance the near-half of the US population that still believes Bush regime lies that Saddam Hussein was involved in the Sept. 11 2001 attacks, and the vast majority that grossly underestimate the number of Iraqi civilians killed in the war), which can combine with basic human dignity (see for instance the majority of the U.S. population that considers the number of civilians killed in Iraq unacceptable despite not knowing anywhere near the true extent, and the number that want the war to end) which will be a powerful combination, especially since messages can include a call to action (cue to scene from V for Vendetta here).


Recent comments
6 weeks 5 days ago
26 weeks 1 day ago
28 weeks 5 days ago
29 weeks 2 days ago
29 weeks 5 days ago
34 weeks 1 day ago
35 weeks 10 hours ago
35 weeks 12 hours ago
38 weeks 4 days ago
38 weeks 5 days ago